Friday, December 22, 2017

Society Snippets: History of the Partisan Monument Part 5

1906 Nov 25 The State
“The legislature of the State of South Carolina has given to the DAR a handsome moonlight which will be ornamented suitably as a monument to the memory of the Revolutionary patriots as typified in the names of Marion, Laurens, Moultrie, Pickens, Sumter, etc.”
Mrs. Robertson, committee chairman, wrote a letter to the regent of each chapter on November 24, 1906.  This letter informed the regents that by their position they were ex-officio members of the committee and that communication would be through the Sunday edition of The State newspaper.  The central committee was Mrs. Robertson, Miss Martin, Mrs. Gantt, Sara Richardson, and Malvina Waring.


1906 Dec 9 The State
News was the work on the monument was being pushed rapidly.  Mrs. Robertson placed a letter to the chapter regents in the newspaper.  The design presented by Mr. Ruckstuhl was formally accepted and a post card photo of the design was to be sent in the next few days. (If any chapter has this post card in their chapter scrapbooks, please let me know!!!)  She asked for regents to let the chairman know their feelings as the central committee wanted each regent to have a personal interest in it. 

She goes on to say that the design was submitted three years ago by Jones and Kepler, architectural draughtsmen.  Unfortunately, the SCDAR was not in a position to have the working drawings made.  Mr. Kepler has moved to Washington, D.C.; however, Mr. Jones was with a reputable firm.  Jones will  have charge of the work while his firm Shand and Lafaye has been given the contract.  The firm showed an interest in the work and only charged the SCDAR half of the usual price for this type of work, $0.05. 
George Collins who did the work on the Gonzales monument and put up the Hampton statue will construct the foundation.  He was recommended highly by Ruckstuhl as being both efficient and obliging.

The monument is to be three sided with the triune concept carried out in every detail.  There would be three broad steps leading up to the pedestal featuring graceful scroll on each corner.  Above this pedestal would be the broken column.  She stated that the column would not be left broken because it was not erected to the memory of “broken and unfinished lives, but to victorious and glorious heroes.”   The column would be capped with a Corinthian capital bearing the insignia of the DAR and on the three sides would be trees representing the low country (palmetto), middle (magnolia), and up country (oak).  All of this would be of the beautiful Fairfield granite [blue granite] which Mr. Ruckstuhl declared to be as fine as any he ever saw.   To finish the monument, a grand bronze eagle with out spread wings on a half sphere would top the monument.  The committee hoped to have Ruckstuhl model the eagle.
She concluded by stating that not only would be monument be to the three Partisan generals but to all “those Revolutionary heroes who fought with them.”  Contributions were not to be given out of obligation but because as a DAR of South Carolina you considered it a privilege and a duty to honor your noble ancestors.

Again, the SCDAR would turn its attention to Memorial Continental Hall.  This time, the SCDAR would focus its efforts in raising the $2000 for its monolithic column for the Memorial Portico.
Memorial Continental Hall - the Memorial Portico is in the left portion of the picture



1907 Jun 23 The State
The central committee met and could happily turn its whole attention to our monument since the column had been entirely paid.  Mrs. Robertson remarked that the SCDAR should be proud that the state had paid for its column.  She had served as a member of the Continental Hall committee by invitation of the president general.  She was in attendance at the meeting when the contributions from the state were announced.  She stated that she wished the members could have heard the enthusiasm when it was announced that SC’s column had been fully paid.

Plans and specifications had been submitted last spring to several contractors to get an idea of the cost for erecting the monument; however, no contract was given.  Based on these estimates, the cost will require at least $5000 and only $1500 was in the bank.


The chapters were encouraged to raise funds to help with this noble cause and to bring those contributions to state conference which would be held the last week in November in Charleston.


1908 Jan 5 The State
The central committee met and was unanimous in its determination to bring about enthusiasm among the state to raise the necessary funds to begin the work during the year with the goal of completing it in two years.  A circular would be sent to all chapter regents urging them to devote their efforts to the completion of the monument.   (If any chapter has this circular, please let me know!) She noted that at state conference, changes to the design were made.  Instead of it being a three sided monument, it would be a four sided shaft to better accommodate the inscriptions.   A letter from Mr. Ruckstuhl had just been received in which he offered any assistance he might give to see the monument completed.



The design which had been accepted by the committee, subject to modifications, was made by Shand and LaFaye.  The meeting closed with discussion for fund raising.  It was resolved to ask chapters to make arrangements for an entertainment on Washington’s birthday [for the purpose of raising funds for the monument].

1908 Feb 8 The State
The state monument committee met at the home of Sara Richardson to meet with Ruckstuhl, the man who executed the Hampton equestrian statue on the state house grounds.  He was on his way to Florence, Italy to execute the Calhoun statue which would be placed in Statuary Hall.  It was hoped to have him execute Victoria which would be the final touch to our monument.

Wade Hampton Equestrian statue
This was also printed in The Daily Record on the same day.



No comments:

Post a Comment